another horrible looking car...

sajmon14 wrote
I just uploaded the wrong file, don't worry.

wrong dash pic, has a Subaru logo

i390.photobucket.com/albums/oo344/sajmon14/11252D1A-0E84-47D9-85C2-4122633CF236_zpss8y3quk4.jpg

This is a proper one

-- Last edit: 2014-11-23 13:13:08

Rinspeed wrote
Now with the new pics, all the car looks bad lol. Nissan can't do something better than that???

Desscythe17 wrote
There isn't something wrong in the pic. It's just the rear of the car that was bad.

Rinspeed wrote
What part of the rear is bad? I mean, the car looks bad anyway, but is something wrong with the picture?

-I'll upload the Japanese pictures, as they don't have a bodykit like this one.

-- Last edit: 2014-11-20 19:47:57

i don't know if it's the picture but the rear of the car seems really bad

Body reminds me a bit of the Renault Sport Spider

-- Last edit: 2014-11-20 08:45:45

Desscythe17 wrote
For me it's a prototype (same category as concept car). This isn't a production car and there is a lot of exotic cars like that: some anouncment but never released in real.

fck wrote
Wouldn't that make this a production car that is still being tested instead of a concept car?

Desscythe17 wrote

They were just renders.

-- Last edit: 2014-11-18 12:34:10

What was wrong with the old pictures? These have copyright or something on them and have a lot of camouflage on them, which doesn't make the pictures representative for the car.

fck wrote
so change it for proto and 2014 (for the moment)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KFp620c5Z4#

video from prototype tests in Ułęż, PL

Gamer wrote
> No. This page is for the lifted version. There is another one 2005/2008 (not on the site at this moment)

Actually, sales already started in 2005.

I couldn't find any pictures of the 4-door sedan, so that will have to wait until later.

-- Last edit: 2018-08-16 16:41:48

Ford78 wrote
It ended today? That's a coincidence. It will probably get a replacement soon though.

That's a shame that its production has ended today...

Desscythe17 wrote
OK.

Ford78 wrote
You didn't listen. Add EVERYTHING, except for top speed, acceleration and fuel consumption.

Rinspeed wrote
Yes, but Desscythe told me to avoid the perfomance specs...

Ford78 wrote
i f you just add pics for a car > clearly no

Desscythe17 wrote
Then should I just add the pictures?

Ford78 wrote
Power, torque, weight, dimensions, as much as possible. Just not the things I said above.

Desscythe17 wrote
OK. So I put only the weight?

Ford78 wrote
You know, performance. Top speed, acceleration, fuel consumption...

Desscythe17 wrote
What you mean "perfomance data"?

Rinspeed wrote
Automobile-catalog has an increasing amount of old japanese cars. You have to watch out for small mistakes though, and performance data should be avoided completely.

Ford78 wrote
There isn't best source on internet. I search with multiple sources, my books, some websites (depending of the car). For example for germans recent cars, the deutsch wikipedia is good with engines. For old japan cars, i don't have nothing on the net.