Petrol | ||||
| 3.8 AMC 232 I-6 | 100 hp / 74kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1971-1972 | |
| 4.2 AMC 258 I-6 | 110 hp / 81kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1971-1972 | |
| 3.3 AMC 199 I-6 | 128 hp / 94kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1969-1970 | |
| 3.8 AMC 232 I-6 | 135 hp / 99kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1970-1971 | |
| 3.8 AMC 232 I-6 | 145 hp / 107kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1969-1970 | |
| 4.2 AMC 258 I-6 | 150 hp / 110kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1970-1971 | |
| 5.0 AMC 304 V8 | 150 hp / 110kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1971-1972 | |
| 3.8 AMC 232 I-6 2-bbl. | 155 hp / 114kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1969-1970 | |
| 5.0 AMC 304 V8 (SST) | 210 hp / 154kW | Rear Wheel Drive | 1969-1971 | |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
phone book...inside a car? Interesting...
|
|
|
yes, thats a picture of the inside of my old Hornet I used to have. The springs in the seats sagged so I used the phone book so I could see the road well.
|
|
|
CA_NES wrote
yes, thats a picture of the inside of my old Hornet I used to have. The springs in the seats sagged so I used the phone book so I could see the road well. I see. Makes sense to me. I've heard of crazier things being used for the same purpose. (child's car seat, for example...) |
|
|
why are the motors 1965-1970 and 1964-1979 if the car was made from 1970 to 1972?
|
|
|
Desscythe17 wrote
why are the motors 1965-1970 and 1964-1979 if the car was made from 1970 to 1972? yes there is a problem, if a specialist can change it.... |
|
|
Rinspeed wrote
yes there is a problem, if a specialist can change it.... according to wikipedia the first motor was only for 1970, and the second one was for 1971/72 (up to 77 for the facelifted Hornet) they also list a lot more engines for the Hornet. but it's wikipedia, so I don't trust it. |