Commentaires
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
|
JFK wrote
These two cars had nothing in common. I had meant as in similarities in appearance, I do not know what you mean. |
||
|
Approximately 113 were exported with small modifications officially by GM to Saudi Arabia.
|
||
|
Why was my similar cars with the TAZ Skoda removed?
|
||
|
How do I add the data for the motorsport results?
|
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
It was actually sold throughout Europe. It will need a separate page for that, this page is just for the JDM version. Yes, but are there any actual differences? |
||
|
This car was sold in the UK, as the Picnic.
|
||
|
How do I submit a image for a replacement?
I refuse to keep this image a Trans Am for the front, when it's meant to be a Firebird. *I will probably make a second page for the Trans Am as well* |
||
|
IIRC, the Charger 500 was only available with the Six-Pack 440
|
||
|
damianea103 wrote
Looks horrible... looks like a fiat multipla buggy |
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
I can see it fine. Does it not load for you? It shows up now, but earlier iit didn't show up for me at all. -- Last edit: 2019-11-25 19:30:54 |
||
|
Where did the front view image go?
|
||
|
This site will never die!
Soon I shall start uploading some truggs. |
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
Alright, calm down there. Generally speaking, we don't make separate pages for cars when they are visually extremely similar to another car sold in the same market. Older Trans Ams have different bumpers, lights, etc. from the normal Firebirds. For the 92-02 model, this is no longer the case. They might have a different hood or something, but other than that, they don't really look different. Therefore, it's not necessary to create a page for every single version of the car. If they have different engines, we can just compile those on one page instead to keep the website from becoming terribly cluttered. The 70-73 Camaro I divided in a couple of pages because they all had very different facias. After 73, there is just a page for the regular Camaro and the Z/28 or IROC-Z. iF i'M perfectly honest, the main reason I'd want to is to keep continuity with the rest of the pages for them, as well as, you know, not keeping all the information on one page that goes under the base model. at the very least, going to replace pictures with ones that are of the actual models(the 92-97 having pictures of a trans am instead makes me sick) I want to make separate pages for them regardless because I already have all the information ready but if it's gonna get me banned or something, I don't know. -- Last edit: 2019-09-30 21:54:01 |
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
I don't think the 92-02 generation looks different enough as a Trans Am to warrant separate pages. Also don't think the Formula looks special enough. Did this man just say they don't lOOK DIFFERENT ENOUGH? or SPECIAL ENOUGH? Desscythe, with all due respect, that's a bit dumb. They're different packages with their own performance statistics and differences from the originals. And if you want to hit me with the whole "tHeY dOnT loOk dIFfErEnT" thing, why do all the packages for the Camaros have different pages? Or the ones for the previous Trans Ams? Regardless I'm already getting stuff put together to make their own pages, so |
||
|
Formula: 1985-1990, 1990-1992
Trans Am: 1992-1997(also please change the pictures of that, they're both of Trans Ams not Firebirds), 1997-2002 |
||
|
For the versions that don't have them, I'm going to be making separate pages for packages for the Firebirds(like Trans Ams, Formulas). Because of this, after the pages are made, is it possible to remove the engines exclusive to those models?
|
||
|
There was a private company that exported 1000 of these to Australia. However, due to a very small amount of evidence to it and the fact it was seperate from International, I don't believe I should add Australia.
|
||
|
I attempted to mark that as NOT
available in Australia. Sorry. |
||
|
I was about to make a page on this tomorrow, guess ya beat me to it :P
|
||
|
Desscythe17 wrote
Why is it a problem? There are few people contributing to this website, and lots of cars out there, so there is bound to be missing cars. What kind of assistance do you need? Specifics for engines and transmissions. I worked on Commodores quite a bit so I'm covered for those, but the stuff like Kingswoods, Monaros and the like are a bit rusty on me. By specifics I mean horses, torque, and what years they were available in them. I ain't trusting Wikipedia. |
||
|
Do you guys realize how much of a problem it is that we're missing the entire 1970s?
Like seriously, I'd already have it half complete, but I don't know if my information is hefty enough to make pages for cars, so if I could get any assistance from you gentlemen it would be appreciated. |
||
|
Im not sure of EXACT details, but I do believe it had all of the engines available in the Pontiac Le Mans of that era. I could be incorrect but from the bit of work I've done on these cars that what I hear.
|
||
|
Now that I have moved to Kansas from Australia, these are pretty common around town. I know for fact that they were not in Australia as my father had some import records from this era and no Lanos or Nubias were on them.
|
||
|
They might eventually make that 2016 concept. Shame they didn't import them into Australia.
|
||
|
carcrasher88 wrote
(Thank you, Google Translate) Yeah, It's a real shame it never went into production. Such a beautiful and powerful car, based on something that was (at the time) in production. Yeah, I would love to see one on the road. |
||
|
I had the 116hp one, it was very fun. Love this old thing!
|
||
|
Yep, imported. I had one, pretty small pretty cool.
|
||
|
Anybody know what this car's counties are? All i know is the States and Australia didnt have them.
|
||
|
Damn,this is sick.
|




if you're trying to add all the cars in the world what's that supposed to mean, I don't get it