Publicité
![](couleurs/106/Borasco Grey.png)
![](couleurs/106/Caesium Blue.png)
![](couleurs/106/Caldera Red.png)
![](couleurs/106/Corris Grey.png)
![](couleurs/106/Eiger Grey.png)
![](couleurs/106/Farallon Pearl Black.png)
![](couleurs/106/Firenze Red.png)
![](couleurs/106/Fuji White.png)
![](couleurs/106/Indus Silver.png)
![](couleurs/106/Narvik Black.png)
![](couleurs/106/Portofino Blue.png)
![](couleurs/106/Santorini Black.png)
![](couleurs/106/Silicon Silver.png)
![](couleurs/106/Yulong White.png)
Commentaires
Auteur | Message |
---|---|
![]() 2018-12-01 22:02 | Rinspeed a écrit why not. I will do it in the future i think. Crossover should be a different category. They are often not suitable for off-road use, whereas SUV's often are. |
![]() ![]() 2018-11-04 10:02 | Desscythe17 a écrit Should we maybe update the category to Off-Road/SUV/Crossover? It makes a lot of cars which aren't really SUVs but called that way by their manufacturer easier to identify. why not. I will do it in the future i think. |
![]() ![]() 2018-11-04 09:25 | Rinspeed a écrit because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. Should we maybe update the category to Off-Road/SUV/Crossover? It makes a lot of cars which aren't really SUVs but called that way by their manufacturer easier to identify. |
![]() 2018-11-01 18:55 | Rinspeed a écrit because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. Fair enough. |
![]() ![]() 2018-10-29 09:05 | CeilingHamster a écrit Why is this listed as off-road/SUV? It looks like a hatchback, in person and in pictures. because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. |
![]() 2018-10-29 01:00 | Why is this listed as off-road/SUV? It looks like a hatchback, in person and in pictures. |
Ajouter un commentaire
Vous devez vous connecter pour poster un commentaire...