Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |
 carcrasher88
2018-09-23 17:18 | Since when was the Fiesta built in Tennessee? Ford doesn't even have an assembly plant in that state. |
 |   Rinspeed
2018-07-11 19:06 | Desscythe17 wrote It has 20 more hp than the normal Mustang, and the other Bullitts also have a separate page since they were created before the limited edition system existed, so I don't know if they should have pages or not. As you want but for the European version i had do on the Mustang page |
|   Desscythe17
2018-07-11 18:22 | Rinspeed wrote ?? it's a limited series, i don't think there is change about engine. Why a page for it? It has 20 more hp than the normal Mustang, and the other Bullitts also have a separate page since they were created before the limited edition system existed, so I don't know if they should have pages or not. |
| Rinspeed
2018-07-11 16:06 | ?? it's a limited series, i don't think there is change about engine. Why a page for it? |
 |
carcrasher88
2018-05-10 05:53 | Still never understood why they went ahead with that 'The Beast' paint scheme, when the actual one from Geiger Cars is the previous generation SVT Raptor. I've got the plain one in grey in my collection. Much nicer looking. |
 |
carcrasher88
2018-05-10 05:49 | For some reason, I figured it was gonna be the Majorette version that gets listed here first. I've got that exact one in my collection, shame it doesn't have an opening feature like the brand's Challenger and Camaro castings. I know that a few other brands have done this Mustang, too. There's a similar true 1/64 Auto World one, Maisto did a rather cheap (and somewhat oddly proportioned) version, Hot Wheels did the Laguna Seca version, and Greenlight did the racing version, the Boss 302R. |
 | Rinspeed
2018-02-02 11:39 | Desscythe17 wrote Agreed, but with BMW, I would list the engine something like 750i (4.4 BMW etc etc). I was thinking of maybe doing something like 4.9 Ford Windsor "5.0"? Yes as you want. Also if someone can do some questions for the first page. I haven't ideas at the moment. |
|   Mark0
2018-01-31 12:25 | Desscythe17 wrote Agreed, but with BMW, I would list the engine something like 750i (4.4 BMW etc etc). I was thinking of maybe doing something like 4.9 Ford Windsor "5.0"? Not a bad idea. |
| Desscythe17
2018-01-31 10:39 | Mark0 wrote I think we should list them as 5.0 Like BMW is amrketing their cars as 750 but car have 4.4 engine. Agreed, but with BMW, I would list the engine something like 750i (4.4 BMW etc etc). I was thinking of maybe doing something like 4.9 Ford Windsor "5.0"? |
| Mark0
2018-01-31 10:29 | I think we should list them as 5.0 Like BMW is amrketing their cars as 750 but car have 4.4 engine. |
| Desscythe17
2018-01-31 10:04 | Just wondering if anyone had an opinion on how to name these engines. From the late 70s on, when American cars switched from cu (302) to cc (4942), Ford sold its 4942cc V8 engine as the 5.0 Ford Windsor, which of course should be 4.9. Should I list it as 5.0, because that is how Ford sold it? Or should I list it as 4.9, because that is correct? -- Last edit: 2018-01-31 10:04:55 |
 |   speedfreak975
2018-01-15 15:31 | I guess kind of fuel affects it also at specific rpm as placed above or might have diff modes. Again the car is very vague till now not much has been specified yet So we will see later on this year. No dimensions on the car at all |
| Desscythe17
2018-01-15 15:11 | speedfreak975 wrote Thats taken directly from a source however the car has alot of ??? As it still somewhat defies logic. I added pics of it tho not sure about these specs its still very vague feel free not to accept entry. As i said the entire car is stilk somewhat mystery Well, I think Rinspeed will reject it, as you didn't add the engine, but you really need some dimensions like length, width, height if you want to add it to the website. Of course, the best thing would be to wait until the car enters production and the car is no longer a mystery. About the specs you posted, why does it first say 5007 hp and then 3006 hp? -- Last edit: 2018-01-15 15:13:20 |
| speedfreak975
2018-01-15 15:03 | Thats taken directly from a source however the car has alot of ??? As it still somewhat defies logic. I added pics of it tho not sure about these specs its still very vague feel free not to accept entry. As i said the entire car is stilk somewhat mystery |
| speedfreak975
2018-01-15 15:01 | 12.3 LITER V16 QUAD TURBO 5,007 HP, 36 PSI 3,519 LB-FT @ 6,600 RPM, 36 PSI 3,006 HP @ 6,900 RPM, 20 PSI (92 93 PUMP GAS DAILY USE) 2,407 TORQUE @ 6,400 RPM, 20 PSI DEVEL SIXTEEN BILLET ENGINE BLOCK DEVEL SIXTEEN CYLINDER HEADS DEVEL SIXTEEN CRANKSHAFT ;DEVEL SIXTEEN BILLET CAMSHAFT (ROLLER CAMSHAFT, STREET TUNE) 2 VALVEs PER CYLINDER (32 TITANIUM VALVE) 81 MM QUAD TURBO |
| Desscythe17
2018-01-15 14:33 | speedfreak975 wrote A production edition of devel sixteen is announced v16 quad turbo 5007hp...not sure if qnyone wants to add it. Im still really bad at adding cars fully with engine specs or if its worth it I would help you, but I can't find any official specifications on the manufacturer's website. |
| speedfreak975
2018-01-15 14:20 | A production edition of devel sixteen is announced v16 quad turbo 5007hp...not sure if qnyone wants to add it. Im still really bad at adding cars fully with engine specs or if its worth it |
 | Desscythe17
2017-09-03 18:59 | Rinspeed wrote bump I didn't see your comment, sorry. I'm not quite sure, the European version is probably identical to this, but it would be nice if it would actually show up on the Ford (Europe) page. If you can find EU spec pictures and have the time, you can do it. Otherwise just leave it. |
| Rinspeed
2017-09-03 18:54 | Rinspeed wrote I do an EU version or no? I don't known if it's necessary bump |
| Rinspeed
2017-09-03 11:03 | I do an EU version or no? I don't known if it's necessary |
 | Desscythe17
2017-06-08 08:54 | Thanks, it has been done. -- Last edit: 2017-06-08 22:00:10 |
|
 Mieguy
2017-06-08 03:25 | Please replace the rear picture. Its from an older model. blog.consumerguide.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2012/08/1997-Ford-Aspire.jpg (see the rear lights, they are different) |
 |
Mieguy
2016-09-25 23:14 | I want to create a question for "What is the best looking US police car?". Any nominations? For this question i nominate the Ford Crown Victoria in Michigan State Police Design: pics.imcdb.org/2/nfs_005611_c20.jpg |
 | Mark0
2016-06-27 23:06 | Welcome .gif ":)") |
| Desscythe17
2016-06-27 22:52 | speedfreak975 wrote Ok I wanted further information, better looking like a village idiot If you want to know anything else, let me know. |
| speedfreak975
2016-06-27 22:36 | Desscythe17 wrote Yes. We always list concept and production cars separately, even if they look very similar. I advise you to wait with adding the 2017 GT though, since the official Ford website still lists it as a "future vehicle". Ok I wanted further information, better looking like a village idiot |
| Desscythe17
2016-06-27 22:34 | speedfreak975 wrote Thanks on the info , just one quick question before reading it  , there are pictures of 2017 production GT , with the number of car produced and all. Do we add this as separate than 2017 concept announced in 2015 Yes. We always list concept and production cars separately, even if they look very similar. I advise you to wait with adding the 2017 GT though, since the official Ford website still lists it as a "future vehicle". -- Last edit: 2016-06-27 22:35:57 |
| speedfreak975
2016-06-27 22:33 | Desscythe17 wrote Maybe this will help: docs.google.com/document/d/1SZma9_UqB_eQQk5wqYHeu9n2Wsmzt3plBzdZAeokjrw/ Sorry it's a long read Also, welcome ^^ Thanks on the info , just one quick question before reading it , there are pictures of 2017 production GT , with the number of car produced and all. Do we add this as separate than 2017 concept announced in 2015 |
| Desscythe17
2016-06-27 22:30 | speedfreak975 wrote Isn't it predecessor the Gt40 and succesor the new ford GT (2017) , I'm not going to change anything because I'm new on this site. I prefer to understand its laws completely Maybe this will help: docs.google.com/document/d/1SZma9_UqB_eQQk5wqYHeu9n2Wsmzt3plBzdZAeokjrw/ Sorry it's a long read Also, welcome ^^ -- Last edit: 2016-06-27 22:30:42 |
| Rinspeed
2016-06-27 22:27 | speedfreak975 wrote Isn't it predecessor the Gt40 and succesor the new ford GT (2017) , I'm not going to change anything because I'm new on this site. I prefer to understand its laws completely GT40 is alittle old for a predecessor, GT 2017 is a successor. And for the difference origin/made in. Made in is the place where the cars is construct. Origin, is more for the origin make, the origin decision to make the car... |
| speedfreak975
2016-06-27 22:19 | Isn't it predecessor the Gt40 and succesor the new ford GT (2017) , I'm not going to change anything because I'm new on this site. I prefer to understand its laws completely |
 |   JFK
2016-04-20 16:47 | Desscythe17 wrote I'm not a fan of that. I think the Mondeo has a majority of its features from Germany, so I think German flag for that car and American flag for the Fusion is fine. Okay. |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-20 16:31 | JFK wrote Maybe "intercontinental" flag (showing the little globe instead of flag) could became a thing. For instance newest Falcon isnt an 100% aussie thing too, and it is based on Mondeo afaik. I'm not a fan of that. I think the Mondeo has a majority of its features from Germany, so I think German flag for that car and American flag for the Fusion is fine. -- Last edit: 2016-04-20 16:31:47 |
| JFK
2016-04-20 15:31 | Desscythe17 wrote It's difficult with global vehicles like these. Ford is an American company, and the Fusion launched 2 years before the Mondeo, so that would be reason for US origin. However, the Mondeo has always been a German Ford, and a big part of the design and mechanicals was probably done in Europe, which is reason for German origin. I personally don't think German origin would make sense on this car, but it's not really my decision what origin the Mondeo is. Maybe "intercontinental" flag (showing the little globe instead of flag) could became a thing. For instance newest Falcon isnt an 100% aussie thing too, and it is based on Mondeo afaik. -- Last edit: 2016-04-20 15:33:23 |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-20 15:28 | Mark0 wrote I know. But i was thinking that they maybe would have same Origin. It's difficult with global vehicles like these. Ford is an American company, and the Fusion launched 2 years before the Mondeo, so that would be reason for US origin. However, the Mondeo has always been a German Ford, and a big part of the design and mechanicals was probably done in Europe, which is reason for German origin. I personally don't think German origin would make sense on this car, but it's not really my decision what origin the Mondeo is. |
| Mark0
2016-04-20 14:48 | Desscythe17 wrote One is the US sedan, the other is the EU hatchback. I know. But i was thinking that they maybe would have same Origin. |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-20 13:06 | Mark0 wrote Aren't this two basically same car? www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=19616 One is the US sedan, the other is the EU hatchback. |
| Mark0
2016-04-20 12:47 | Aren't this two basically same car? www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=19616 |
 |
Gamer
2016-03-25 13:16 | I've just done it again - a very special concept in fact... |
 | Mark0
2016-03-02 16:17 | You can add it. |
|
carcrasher88
2016-03-02 03:39 | This page can be cut off as 2013-15, as the 2016 version wears the front fascia design of the restyled 2017 Fusion. Here's some examples: www.jayski.com/news/schemes/2016/story/_/page/2016-NASCAR-Sprint-Cup-17-Team-Schemes |
 | Desscythe17
2016-02-21 17:06 | Just a note about the pickups no longer in production I have been adding: My main source does not have specs for them, so I got specs from Autoblog and some other decent-looking sites. Sadly, Autoblog only gives specs for the standard engines and not the optional engines, so some specifications (weight in particular) might be off or missing. -- Last edit: 2016-02-21 17:06:45 |
 | Mark0
2016-01-14 22:19 | Even Rolls-Royce was made 5 Mustangs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Mustang_Mk.X |
 | JFK
2015-12-30 14:03 | Mieguy wrote First it was an unofficial export, but Ford USA later supported it. This is only for 1964-1979 model years. We had an argument on German Wikipedia right about that topic. The Mach 1 was not exported, only the standard cars. Oh, I added T5 Mach 1 because of this brochure: oldcarbrochures.org/var/albums/NA/Ford_%20Mustang/1971_Ford_Mustang/1971-Ford-T5-%28Export%29/1971%20Ford%20T5-02-03.jpg?m=1328639520 But I can be wrong, after all, you are German, not me |
|
Mieguy
2015-12-30 11:31 | First it was an unofficial export, but Ford USA later supported it. This is only for 1964-1979 model years. We had an argument on German Wikipedia right about that topic. The Mach 1 was not exported, only the standard cars. -- Last edit: 2015-12-30 11:31:50 |
| Desscythe17
2015-12-30 11:13 | JFK wrote I dont know if some variants were not exported to Germany, but every pre-1979 Mustang should have secondary name Ford T5 But was the Mustang always officially available in Germany, or was it only available via export? |
| JFK
2015-12-30 00:24 | I dont know if some variants were not exported to Germany, but every pre-1979 Mustang should have secondary name Ford T5 |
 | JFK
2015-12-27 14:29 | Okay |
| Desscythe17
2015-12-27 09:21 | Don't link concept cars to production cars please. |
| JFK
2015-11-15 17:36 | sajmon14 wrote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ_ezdAZRxA And we have a winner! |
