United KingdomAdvertising
Comments
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Gamer
2012-12-30 14:05 | Hereīs the other concept, introduced with this car. Do you think itīs worth adding? technwheelz.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/mini-spiritual-0.jpg |
  Rinspeed
2012-12-23 23:03 | Gamer wrote Well then, what did you do here? www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=1035 it's not false informations like your car, you put BMW instead of Mini, wrong name of car, wrong engine. The example you take is a concept of chinese car that we dont have information (there isnt information on it like a lot of chinese concept, i had search 10s for you car and i had see all the information of the engine, so there isn't comparaison). |
|
Gamer
2012-12-23 22:28 | Well then, what did you do here? www.webcarstory.com/voiture.php?id=1035 |
| Rinspeed
2012-12-17 21:52 | we arent here to post false informations |
|
Gamer
2012-12-17 21:22 | Rinspeed wrote you post it in BMW, with a 3.1 (very big for an engine) ?? and no informations for the engine. Yes, I posted 3.1 because I had no idea what the engine was. So, FTTB (for the time being) I posted it as a 3.1 until someone would edit it. .gif ";)") -- Last edit: 2012-12-17 21:22:23 |
| Rinspeed
2012-12-17 18:33 | Gamer wrote I posted a similair Mini concept car, this one: sites.google.com/site/rodosnightlifeclub2/home/rnl-news/x-cars-moto/2012/mini-concept-1997-2012/mini-1997.jpg. Why hasīnt it been admitted yet? Because I did post the engine.... you post it in BMW, with a 3.1 (very big for an engine) ?? and no informations for the engine. |
|
Gamer
2012-12-17 16:00 | I posted a similair Mini concept car, this one: sites.google.com/site/rodosnightlifeclub2/home/rnl-news/x-cars-moto/2012/mini-concept-1997-2012/mini-1997.jpg. Why hasīnt it been admitted yet? Because I did post the engine.... -- Last edit: 2012-12-17 16:00:32 |
Add a comment
You must login to post comments...