Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
![]() ![]() 2025-02-16 09:59 | Desscythe17 wrote I agree, only the EV is a new generation. Not the same chassis code F66 than before F56 and for Wikipedia and others it's a new generation even if it's a big facelift. | |
![]() ![]() 2025-02-14 22:18 | SolanaBogon wrote Shouldn't it be merged with the previous "generation"? It's basically just a facelift I agree, only the EV is a new generation. | |
![]() 2025-02-14 18:25 | Shouldn't it be merged with the previous "generation"? It's basically just a facelift | |
![]() 2024-04-05 12:56 | This concept was built by Mini's Munich Design Studio, which is located within BMW FIZ (BMW Group Forschungs- und Innovationszentrum) : startupvalley.news/de/urbanaut/ | |
![]() ![]() 2022-05-01 09:25 | Desscythe17 wrote 2018 facelift seems to be missing. the 2018 facelift is very very light with only Matrix Led, rear light with Union Jack and some colors. I haven't do it in 2018 because it's minor. | |
![]() ![]() 2022-04-29 13:25 | 2018 facelift seems to be missing. | |
![]() ![]() 2019-11-23 09:03 | Lancia wrote Why were my colors not approved for this car? I spent a lot of time listing through the brochure to get the names! wrong years, wrong pics (Cooper instead of Clubman...) | |
![]() ![]() 2019-11-22 17:39 | Why were my colors not approved for this car? I spent a lot of time listing through the brochure to get the names! | |
![]() ![]() 2018-05-08 21:32 | I think EU-spec pics would be more fitting, but as you say, there is no Mini USA page, so it's not a problem. | |
![]() ![]() 2018-05-08 16:16 | carcrasher88 wrote Euro-spec page, US-spec images...I don't get it. There isn't Mini USA on the site | |
![]() 2018-05-08 15:29 | Euro-spec page, US-spec images...I don't get it. | |
![]() ![]() 2018-04-26 11:04 | Rinspeed wrote You think that the new lifting for Mini needs a new page? Except the UK flag in the rear light, i don't see other thing. They also changed front lights, but yes I don't think it deserves new page. -- Last edit: 2018-04-26 13:32:32 | |
![]() ![]() 2018-04-26 00:42 | You think that the new lifting for Mini needs a new page? Except the UK flag in the rear light, i don't see other thing. | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-13 20:04 | based on what statistics ? anyways its your rules. i just wanted a clear answer and i got it from JFK . | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-13 18:28 | speedfreak975 wrote not where i live...you have to take in account the location of the spotter....you live in Britain offcourse its common...no offense. for example I've seen 3 f150s in my life...pretty sure americans have seen hundreds in a lot of countries it's common. This isn't a rare car. F150 is only common in America. | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-13 17:56 | not where i live...you have to take in account the location of the spotter....you live in Britain offcourse its common...no offense. for example I've seen 3 f150s in my life...pretty sure americans have seen hundreds -- Last edit: 2017-03-13 17:56:49 | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-13 08:34 | speedfreak975 wrote it was the S that should count for something anyways it your rules The S models are really common though. | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-13 04:51 | it was the S that should count for something anyways it your rules | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-12 21:03 | speedfreak975 wrote elaborate ? For normal Mini, only the John Cooper Works | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-12 18:13 | speedfreak975 wrote elaborate ? Sports cars, convertibles, expensive cars over 80 000 euros, prototypes and cars over 30 years and that kind of stuff. I guess the car wasnt considered special enough. Prototypes have 100 points by default, race cars 10, regular street cars are rewarded by pricetag when new.. Multiplier is given when the car is older. EDIT Also it might be cars that arent that old but they werent imported officially, like US and JDM stuff, but dont quote me on that. -- Last edit: 2017-03-12 18:18:52 | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-12 17:59 | Rinspeed wrote not in the categories we accept elaborate ? | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-12 13:05 | speedfreak975 wrote i spotted a black 2016 mini cooper s and red mini carbio cooper s. why was the black car not accepted not in the categories we accept | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-12 12:52 | i spotted a black 2016 mini cooper s and red mini carbio cooper s. why was the black car not accepted | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-09 19:57 | Mark0 wrote Cooper version have 3 cyl engine not 4 cyl corrected thanks | |
![]() ![]() 2017-03-09 18:47 | Cooper version have 3 cyl engine not 4 cyl | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-17 19:24 | JFK wrote Thank you and your brother very much ![]() You are welcome ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-17 15:44 | Mark0 wrote He checked it. It's OK. Thank you and your brother very much ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-17 10:03 | JFK wrote Everything should be ok (I got the info from automobile catalog EDIT - that is a website, not magazine), but it seems kinda odd to me that there was no 1976-1980 1.1 automatic variant, only the 1.0 (which wasnt in these years as manual), also it is weird that 1969-1972 automatic variant have different power. If your brother will be not bothered, could he please check these two out? He checked it. It's OK. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-15 22:29 | Desscythe17 wrote Is the front the only difference between this and the standard Mini? I found that the Clubman came in multiple bodystyles (most notably the squarer wagon with the double doors at the rear), but I didn't know this was also called the Clubman. As far as I know front end is the only difference in exterior (the car was meant to replace original Mini) . Before I knew this car was a thing, I thought also that Clubman = Wagon. Apparently this was a sedan, wagon and van (van is aussies thing, and it was not based on the generation that was on sale, but rather Mk1 Mini with Clubman/1275GT front) Mark0 wrote My brother is expert in Classic Mini's. If you need some help i will call him ![]() Everything should be ok (I got the info from automobile catalog EDIT - that is a website, not magazine), but it seems kinda odd to me that there was no 1976-1980 1.1 automatic variant, only the 1.0 (which wasnt in these years as manual), also it is weird that 1969-1972 automatic variant have different power. If your brother will be not bothered, could he please check these two out? -- Last edit: 2016-02-15 23:16:51 | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-15 21:50 | My brother is expert in Classic Mini's. If you need some help i will call him ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-15 21:22 | Is the front the only difference between this and the standard Mini? I found that the Clubman came in multiple bodystyles (most notably the squarer wagon with the double doors at the rear), but I didn't know this was also called the Clubman. | |
![]() ![]() 2016-02-15 21:15 | One of the most oddest car that I ever done. Apparently thwre were sometimes different engine variants (even displacement) for MT and AT. | |
![]() ![]() 2015-10-04 23:42 | Mieguy wrote I sat in the Clubman in Frankfurt. All these nice classic looking switches and the dashboard is pretty cool and nice. Regardless of the amount of doors this car is not practical. A car for beginners and fashionable people, but the ordinary (british) man will not like it. My dad took his time getting to know this car at Frankfurt. He has owned many cars, but he really liked the Clubman. I think the car is fine for young families or people who don't have kids to drive around (anymore). Only downside to the car in my opinion is the price, but that is nothing shocking. | |
![]() 2015-10-04 21:58 | I sat in the Clubman in Frankfurt. All these nice classic looking switches and the dashboard is pretty cool and nice. Regardless of the amount of doors this car is not practical. A car for beginners and fashionable people, but the ordinary (british) man will not like it. | |
![]() 2014-10-27 08:29 | Mini Superleggera? Oh. My God. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-09-24 22:08 | Desscythe17 wrote Anyone else who finds the rear bumper on this car to look really disproportionate/weird/ugly? i had the same feeling | |
![]() ![]() 2014-09-24 21:55 | Anyone else who finds the rear bumper on this car to look really disproportionate/weird/ugly? | |
![]() 2014-08-26 22:29 | The correction which was made is: I added the power and the torque. Previously, it didn't that information before the correction was done. | |
![]() ![]() 2014-03-23 16:33 | Rinspeed wrote there isn't more Mini One? It has been revealed. en.autowp.ru/picture/ck1g5j | |
![]() ![]() 2014-03-06 09:30 | Gamer wrote The only "true" variants: One Cooper Convertible Countryman You seem very loyal to the concept when you don't even know which is which. You said Countryman, but you meant Clubman, as you just said a comment ago that you despise the Countryman. Whatever, I like all their models, and I'm not going to bitch about it because of a reason that isn't really a reason. | |
![]() 2014-03-06 07:10 | The only "true" variants: One Cooper Convertible Clubman -- Last edit: 2014-08-10 19:44:13 | |
![]() ![]() 2014-03-04 08:28 | I actually like it, I don't understand why people are always so conservative about the Mini, saying that it's too big and that the different variants on it aren't supposed to exist. I think the Mini should be adjusted to modern standards, and it's only more fun that they try to do different things with its concept. Many people love the Mini concept, and wanted one even though it is way too small. So the Countryman is a very decent solution for those kinds of people. | |
![]() 2014-03-04 07:08 | Disgusting! BMW is just raping the Mini nowadaysor milking the Mini cash cow bone-dry. | |
![]() 2013-12-01 13:33 | Me too. I'm going to add more cars and see if this error appears or not. | |
![]() ![]() 2013-12-01 13:31 | Ford78 wrote I saw an error which I don't remember but the number is 761... i dont know why | |
![]() 2013-12-01 13:22 | I saw an error which I don't remember but the number is 761... | |
![]() ![]() 2013-12-01 13:21 | Ford78 wrote When I added a car, it gave a fatal error. Why? ?? | |
![]() 2013-12-01 13:19 | When I added a car, it gave a fatal error. Why? | |
![]() 2013-11-26 20:13 | Nice to see 3-cylinder engines reappearing in the US market. We've hardly had any in the last decade or so, and only one of those is still available today, the smart ForTwo. The Honda Insight has gone I-4, the Chevrolet Metro has been succeeded by the I-4 Spark. But now, we're getting an EcoBoost I-3 Ford Fiesta, the Mitsubishi Mirage (albeit being sub-par, even for basic transportation), and now this. I've got the feeling that the I-3 is gonna have a resurgence in the US, just like diesel has in the last few years. | |
![]() ![]() 2013-11-25 21:58 | OK |