Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |   Lancia
2020-03-05 04:01 | The exterior pictures are the car in the "Glacier White" color |
 | Lancia
2019-10-31 22:05 | SolanaBogon wrote Should we link the 1957 original model as "predecessor" ? Is there a difference between the two ? It is built on the original blueprints, so it essentially the same. |
|   Rinspeed
2019-10-31 22:03 | SolanaBogon wrote Should we link the 1957 original model as "predecessor" ? Is there a difference between the two ? not the predecessor it's almost the same car |
|
SolanaBogon
2019-10-31 17:44 | Should we link the 1957 original model as "predecessor" ? Is there a difference between the two ? |
 |
 CeilingHamster
2019-08-14 22:08 | I think the same factory is listed twice. Birmingham, UK is in the West Midlands. |
 |
CeilingHamster
2019-05-25 18:50 | Sadly, Malcolm Sayer would die before the car was greenlit for production. |
 |   Mark0
2019-02-23 18:47 | No. It's Mark 2. Big luxury ones have Roman numeral's like Mark IX or Mark X, but Mark 1 and 2 have 'normal' numbers as their model names. |
|   Desscythe17
2019-02-23 18:26 | This should be Mark II I think. |
|
CeilingHamster
2019-02-23 14:39 | We need to work out a proper syntax for model names like this. Some Jaguars are written as 'Mark IX' while this one is written as 'Mark 2'. I'm not entirely sure which one is right (or if it even matters) but consistency would be appreciated. |
 |
CeilingHamster
2018-12-07 19:54 | US should be yes not no. My bad! |
 |
CeilingHamster
2018-12-01 22:02 | Rinspeed wrote why not. I will do it in the future i think. Crossover should be a different category. They are often not suitable for off-road use, whereas SUV's often are. |
 | Mark0
2018-11-18 08:41 | This one is open seater. Thanks for figures .gif ":)") |
|
CeilingHamster
2018-11-17 00:56 | I'm not sure if this is the open seater or the Drop-Head version. The production numbers for the open seater is 3349. The Drop-Head has 2790. Please add whichever is appropriate. |
| Rinspeed
2018-11-04 10:02 | Desscythe17 wrote Should we maybe update the category to Off-Road/SUV/Crossover? It makes a lot of cars which aren't really SUVs but called that way by their manufacturer easier to identify. why not. I will do it in the future i think. |
| Desscythe17
2018-11-04 09:25 | Rinspeed wrote because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. Should we maybe update the category to Off-Road/SUV/Crossover? It makes a lot of cars which aren't really SUVs but called that way by their manufacturer easier to identify. |
|
CeilingHamster
2018-11-01 18:55 | Rinspeed wrote because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. Fair enough. |
| Rinspeed
2018-10-29 09:05 | CeilingHamster wrote Why is this listed as off-road/SUV? It looks like a hatchback, in person and in pictures. because Jaguar said that it's a SUV. |
|
CeilingHamster
2018-10-29 01:00 | Why is this listed as off-road/SUV? It looks like a hatchback, in person and in pictures. |
 |
 carcrasher88
2018-04-28 01:34 | Well, word has it that the ATS and CTS will be replaced by two new models with the 'CT' nameplating, specifically a CT3 and CT4 to replace the ATS (not sure if the 3 would be the sedan and 4 the coupe, similar to BMW, or perhaps the reverse), and a CT5 to replace the CTS. It also seems like the Japanese brands are the only ones sticking to their guns with cars, along with crossovers and SUVs. Mitsubishi's sticking with the Mirage and Mirage G4 for the long run, even with just three CUVs alongside it in the lineup. Honda's keeping a great mix in their lineup, with CUVs based on or closely related to their cars, but not at the expense of the cars (Fit/HR-V, Civic/CR-V, Accord/Pilot), plus a truck and a minivan (Honda being only one of two brands in the US offering a pickup and a minivan in their lineup, the other being Toyota, because I'm not sure if the Transit Connect truly fits as a minivan), and will likely benefit the most from other company's product cuts. |
| Desscythe17
2018-04-27 16:09 | carcrasher88 wrote Ford's cuts are pretty much confirmed. From what I've heard ONE of the three (300, Charger, Challenger) will get cut, with replacements for the other two coming in 2021. I've heard about GM considering cutting the Sonic, Impala, Volt and XTS, but nothing about the LaCrosse or CT6. The XTS needs to go, anyway. It really doesn't make sense to have two similarly sized sedans in the lineup, even if one is FWD and the other RWD. Kinda similar to why Lexus is considering cutting the GS and keeping the ES. Still, the automakers are gonna eventually kill the US auto market with crossovers and SUVs, especially when gas prices are on the climb once again...and, even after the summer season is over, they're not likely to go back down as much as they have. I agree, it seems very unwise for all of them to go after the same thing. Even if there is a crossover craze right now, I don't think there is unlimited demand for them. And like you say, if the gas prices climb again, consumers will be running back to economic cars, and these companies will just look stupid with showrooms full of SUVs. Regarding the cars I mentioned, it's just straight out of the Autoblog articles, might not be 100% accurate. Apparently the boss at Cadillac recently changed, and the old one was very reluctant to get rid of all those sedans. Now that there is someone new, it seems likely that Cadillac will cut at least the XTS, perhaps also the CTS and ATS. I would be surprised if they discontinue the CT6, seeing how that is the newest car they have. |
|
carcrasher88
2018-04-27 13:32 | Ford's cuts are pretty much confirmed. From what I've heard ONE of the three (300, Charger, Challenger) will get cut, with replacements for the other two coming in 2021. I've heard about GM considering cutting the Sonic, Impala, Volt and XTS, but nothing about the LaCrosse or CT6. The XTS needs to go, anyway. It really doesn't make sense to have two similarly sized sedans in the lineup, even if one is FWD and the other RWD. Kinda similar to why Lexus is considering cutting the GS and keeping the ES. Still, the automakers are gonna eventually kill the US auto market with crossovers and SUVs, especially when gas prices are on the climb once again...and, even after the summer season is over, they're not likely to go back down as much as they have. |
| Desscythe17
2018-04-27 00:38 | Mark0 wrote That's exactly what I need, another SUV... I've been reading a few articles on Autoblog lately, and it seems the American market is going to be nothing but crossovers and SUVs. Ford is planning to stop producing all cars that aren't crossovers/SUVs in the US, other than the Mustang and the new Focus Active. Chrysler is looking to stop producing the 300 and Charger. GM has apparently been thinking about axing a lot of models, starting with the Chevy Sonic, Impala and Volt, Buick LaCrosse, and Cadillac XTS and CT6. If the big three do this, there will basically be no American sedans left, which leaves the market to the Korean and Japanese companies, if they don't decide to do the same thing. |
| Mark0
2018-04-25 14:31 | Desscythe17 wrote Well, they're expecting the Lancer Evo to come back as a crossover, but I don't think that makes you happier. That's exactly what I need, another SUV... |
 | Mark0
2018-04-25 14:31 | They are listed that way on automobile-catalog site, but that's mistake. R4 engines are called Ingenium and they are Jaguar Land Rover development. And V6 are AJ-V6. |
| Desscythe17
2018-04-25 09:20 | Are the engine names on this car really correct? I can't find proof of the I-4 and V6 being from Mazda and Toyota. What's more, the 1MZ-FE engine from Toyota was in cars between 1993 and 2006, so I highly doubt that it would appear in a 2015+ top-of-the-line Jaguar. |
| Desscythe17
2018-04-25 09:12 | Mark0 wrote Jaguar stopped production of V6 XE and XF. First they stopped producing V12 and V8 cars. Then they stopped prodcing Lancer Evolution. Every single manufacturer have SUV in their range. What's next? Well, they're expecting the Lancer Evo to come back as a crossover, but I don't think that makes you happier. |
| Mark0
2018-04-25 08:25 | Jaguar stopped production of V6 XE and XF. First they stopped producing V12 and V8 cars. Then they stopped prodcing Lancer Evolution. Every single manufacturer have SUV in their range. What's next? |
| Rinspeed
2017-10-25 13:04 | Mark0 wrote Should I list US version on separate page? Only difference is front lights, but we listed Citroen SM on separate page. Also there are different engines for US market. as you want |
| Mark0
2017-10-25 12:34 | Should I list US version on separate page? Only difference is front lights, but we listed Citroen SM on separate page. Also there are different engines for US market. -- Last edit: 2017-10-25 12:42:45 |
 |
carcrasher88
2017-09-09 05:06 | Name is Future-Type, not Future F-Type. |
 | Rinspeed
2017-02-23 10:56 | Spyshot: www.autoevolution.com/news/2018-jaguar-e-pace-spied-in-the-snow-could-become-quickest-selling-jaguar-ever-114572.html |
 | Mark0
2016-05-31 14:54 | There are 24.282 cars made and i can't find single one for restoration... |
 | Rinspeed
2014-07-22 09:41 | This concept made by Jaguar will replace the XF Sportbrake for Sky team on Tour de France this saturday. |
 | Mark0
2013-11-25 22:26 | Well there was little competition. There was PC game (never saw that game before) where you need to drive F-Type around Silverstone and three fastest times get to test drive real F-Type. |
| Desscythe17
2013-11-25 22:12 | That's amazing! I wish I could test drive such a car. |
| Mark0
2013-11-25 22:10 | Desscythe17 wrote I saw a convertible this summer when I went to Rome. Its beauty blew me away, and its sound even more so! Oh, and if you want to hear it quickly, watch the first 20 seconds of this video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT30Qmh4aHY Jaguar come to Serbia in October and i was test driving V6 S on their promotion. Amazing car. |
| Desscythe17
2013-11-25 22:02 | Mark0 wrote Greatest. It has more style and performance than any US or European car  I saw a convertible this summer when I went to Rome. Its beauty blew me away, and its sound even more so! Oh, and if you want to hear it quickly, watch the first 20 seconds of this video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT30Qmh4aHY -- Last edit: 2013-11-25 22:04:06 |
| Mark0
2013-11-25 21:51 | Greatest. It has more style and performance than any US or European car -- Last edit: 2013-11-25 21:51:35 |
 | Desscythe17
2013-09-20 23:14 | Mark0 wrote And they are better in quality. I just restored my 1980 Range Rover. There was no need to restore engine, it work great as the day it's made. But my friend bought new BMW X6 in 2008 and yesterday his gearbox brake down. I have a friend who owns a lot of older Land Rovers, he says fixing them when they break down is child's play I bet that your friend with the BMW has to pay a lot of money to a garage to fix it.. |
| Mark0
2013-09-20 17:58 | And they are better in quality. I just restored my 1980 Range Rover. There was no need to restore engine, it work great as the day it's made. But my friend bought new BMW X6 in 2008 and yesterday his gearbox brake down. |
| Desscythe17
2013-09-16 17:48 | I don't get it either, I prefer a sleek coupé or a sedan or even a hatchback, but oh well. Too bad the real SUVs are disappearing, for example the Range Rover, it isn't even close to what it was in the seventies/eighties. |
| Mark0
2013-09-16 16:03 | Whats wrong with people now? Everyone wants to drive SUV's. |
 |
 Andra125
2012-12-16 18:08 | I never knew there was a wagon version  |
 | Mark0
2012-12-15 10:46 | Brutal! |
 | Mark0
2012-12-12 18:48 | Now i am finishing Formula D. EDIT: Finished -- Last edit: 2012-12-13 15:33:05 |
 | Mark0
2012-07-16 08:08 | My brother own 4.0. Very nice car. |
 | Desscythe17
2012-05-22 22:28 | interior pic is the same as rear pic. |
 | Rinspeed
2012-04-28 12:27 | Mark0 wrote Are you planing to do any other Jaguar? at this moment only the XK (3) |
| Mark0
2012-04-28 11:57 | Are you planing to do any other Jaguar? |
 | Mark0
2012-04-10 20:53 | Moe info here www.jaguarxj.info/JAGUAR%20XJ%20SERIES%20II.htm |