Advertising
Comments
Author | Message |
---|---|
JFK 2016-02-06 21:28 | fck wrote I don't think so, I can't remind any light front-engined fwd car which won't go straight every time you try to turn on slippery ground. :P BTW. Do you know why it won't went into serial production? Damn, the traditional thought of rear wheel drive in Skoda 120 is too strong. Silly me, my brain goes "It is rear wheel drive!" every time when I dont force myself to look at the data + there were multiple fairly similar variats made, for instance front engine, rear wheel drive, transaxle transmission. As always, insuccifient amount of money. -- Last edit: 2016-02-06 21:34:15 |
fck 2016-02-06 21:23 | JFK wrote If they were making this, you would need cement in back though... I don't think so, I can't remind any light front-engined fwd car which won't go straight every time you try to turn on slippery ground. :P BTW. Do you know why it won't went into serial production? |
JFK 2016-02-06 21:09 | fck wrote Too bad it just a prototype. Driving a 742 in winter without packing cement bags to the front sounds like blessing. If they were making this, you would need cement in back though... |
fck 2016-02-06 21:03 | JFK wrote Yes - front engine, front wheel drive. Too bad it just a prototype. Driving a 742 in winter without packing cement bags to the front sounds like blessing. |
JFK 2016-02-06 20:56 | fck wrote Did I see correctly that it has front-placed engine? Yes - front engine, front wheel drive. |
fck 2016-02-06 20:27 | Did I see correctly that it has front-placed engine? |
JFK 2015-09-11 14:58 | Two years older than its Slovakian counterpart BAZ 742 PP. I doubt that you can see rear badging, but it actually says Škoda 120 L. But L model had single headlights, so it cant be L (GLS had chromed things around double headlights). This car is pretty much mashup. -- Last edit: 2015-09-11 16:31:47 |
Add a comment
You must login to post comments...