Comments
Related page | Author | Message |
---|---|---|
![]() ![]() 2012-08-02 12:09 | I'll wait for Rinspeed's opinion then, I don't want to make mistakes. | |
![]() ![]() 2012-08-02 12:01 | Desscythe17 wrote And also, am I allowed to fill in predecessors/successors that are not on webcarstory? Ithink it's useless, at least until it'snot possible to edit pre(su)ccessors to put a dbnumbers to them. You have to ask Rinspeed,he made that. But in my humble opinion, one closest pre(su)ccessor is good enough. -- Last edit: 2012-08-02 12:08:08 | |
![]() ![]() 2012-08-02 11:48 | And also, am I allowed to fill in predecessors/successors that are not on webcarstory? | |
![]() ![]() 2012-08-02 11:01 | When filling in Predecessor/Successor, do you want Integra -> Integra -> Integra -> RSX, or just the final Integra -> RSX? | |
![]() ![]() 2012-05-14 18:17 | Dashboard comes from first gen NSX www.madwhips.com/upload/images/purple_acura_nsx_tan_interior_17.JPG | |
![]() ![]() 2012-05-13 17:52 | Based on the orginal NSX for the movie "The Avengers" | |
![]() 2011-11-13 23:15 | Acura hasn't specified a date, but it is expected that this will be sold in Canada in the future. For now, US only. | |
![]() 2011-11-13 21:17 | Just filled the 'Made for' chart, which was easy, seeing as this was a Canada-exclusive vehicle. | |
![]() 2011-11-13 21:14 | Does anyone know the name of Acura's Southern California studio? If anyone does, that would be great, because that's where it was designed. Also, on the availability of the vehicle in Canada, I checked the official Acura Canada site, to make sure. ![]() Edit: Acura Mexico website also lists the ZDX as an available vehicle. -- Last edit: 2011-11-13 23:17:45 | |
![]() ![]() 2011-05-29 18:16 | no informations about it, just that it's a demonstration of a sportive trim from acura for sema show | |
![]() ![]() 2011-05-29 18:10 | i don,t have informations for it | |
![]() 2011-05-27 18:52 | Just finished the Acura EL (Canada) page, the images are small, so if they need to be replaced, go ahead. They were the only 'official' pics I could find. | |
![]() ![]() 2011-02-12 17:57 | subzero wrote Rinspeed, is it possible for you to add "Passsenger volume" in the "add a motor page"? Some other important stuffs are missing like "list of safety features", etc i don't think it's neccessary for passenger volume. For safety features it's impossible, depending of the country and the level trim of the car, too difficult. Other thing, Tak and me had separate in two parts the cars (because of our competence). So if your car don't accept immediatly it's because one or other verify when he can. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 17:43 | Try lower the picture resolution... If loading time takes too long. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 17:25 | subzero wrote I use netcarshow for the pictures. I guess it does work...now I'm starting to get the hang of this thing. Thanks! I've got the Lucerne page complete. All photos, and 4 engines. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:58 | I use netcarshow for the pictures. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:56 | subzero wrote I can't seem to get the picture to load to the site. You got any other sites for images alone? Those sites are great for specs, but images are giving me a hard time... | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:50 | subzero wrote Thanks! Now to work on some pages. I'm going to start with the Buick Lucerne. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:44 | I use this www.carfolio.com/ www.carsplusplus.com/main/index.php | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:42 | Ok, does anyone here know any reliable sources on the net for official photos, without watermarks, of course (which means I can't use netcarshow.com, no matter how reliable they are...)? | |
![]() 2011-02-12 16:12 | Rinspeed, is it possible for you to add "Passsenger volume" in the "add a motor page"? Some other important stuffs are missing like "list of safety features", etc -- Last edit: 2011-02-12 16:12:24 | |
![]() 2011-02-12 15:21 | Rinspeed wrote Another time, i said that now we don't accept car with just only pictures or whitout the motors informations (and not only one when there are 10 motors for a car) because if we accept them, we had to work a lot to complete your cars! So we can do them ourself. So if you want your car will be accept= pictures + all the motors and max informations on them. ok.. sure! | |
![]() 2011-02-12 14:30 | Rinspeed wrote Another time, i said that now we don't accept car with just only pictures or whitout the motors informations (and not only one when there are 10 motors for a car) because if we accept them, we had to work a lot to complete your cars! So we can do them ourself. So if you want your car will be accept= pictures + all the motors and max informations on them. I understand. I'm currently unable to meet those requirements, as I have no idea which sites I can and can't use. My apologies for my unnecessary eagerness to post without all required info. It might be a while before I post anymore new cars... | |
![]() 2011-02-12 13:43 | Sorry | |
![]() ![]() 2011-02-12 09:47 | Another time, i said that now we don't accept car with just only pictures or whitout the motors informations (and not only one when there are 10 motors for a car) because if we accept them, we had to work a lot to complete your cars! So we can do them ourself. So if you want your car will be accept= pictures + all the motors and max informations on them. | |
![]() 2011-02-12 00:18 | Rinspeed wrote why dont you post pictures with your cars (because we could erase them immediatly if not picture or not motors) Hi Rinspeed, its me, Ford78. | |
![]() 2011-02-11 22:49 | Rinspeed wrote why dont you post pictures with your cars (because we could erase them immediatly if not picture or not motors) It's because I'm not sure which sites I can get them from, and I don't have means of taking pictures in person. I'll look around, but I'm trying to play it safe, not to get in trouble with other sites. The logos are easy, the actual car pics, are a little more tricky... | |
![]() ![]() 2011-02-11 22:46 | why dont you post pictures with your cars (because we could erase them immediatly if not picture or not motors) | |
![]() 2011-02-11 21:51 | Please disregard the first 2006 Acura. I screwed up and accidentally hit submit. Please only count the 2006 RDX page. | |
![]() ![]() 2011-02-09 17:06 | Already 6 points? ![]() | |
![]() ![]() 2011-02-09 14:15 | bien sur | |
![]() 2011-02-09 14:13 | Il a vraiment t commercialis ? |