Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |
 HQMonaro1972
2016-11-08 22:51 | Anybody know what this car's counties are? All i know is the States and Australia didnt have them. |
 |
 Mieguy
2016-08-20 14:27 | Added my car now. Picture was from one visit to the Nürburgring where i almost got stuck in the mud. Almost - because a V6 gets never stuck. I actually had two of the same kind: One 1999 and one 2000 model year. The only differences on the newer car are a CD player and black leather seats. So i think its stupid to put both cars. -- Last edit: 2016-08-20 14:32:33 |
 |   sajmon14
2016-04-21 18:25 | The 124 Spider might be selling good, well but they also need a good selling city car/sedan. I hope that the Tipo will be doing good in sales |
|   Desscythe17
2016-04-20 22:51 | JFK wrote Nice going Fiat group... Well it was predicted. They only sold the Ypsilon, which is slowly fading out, so there is no reason for Chrysler to be in the UK anymore. As for Fiat, I don't think everything is going as planned. They seem to be focusing completely on SUVs and crossovers, since their other cars don't sell that well (even the Fiat 500 has had its best days), and in the long run, you could ask yourself if the amount of brands they have is really reasonable. I don't think Chrysler and Dodge have a reason the exist at the same time, and since Jeep has taken over all of the SUVs and Ram became a seperate brand, Dodge has very little to offer except for the Charger and Challenger, which are both dated. (Chrysler only has the 300 (=Charger), and the new Pacifica) Lancia is definitely disappearing, and I don't see Alfa Romeo sticking around for much longer, so unless they launch a surprisingly successful car out of nowhere, I think Fiat-Chrysler isn't going to get anywhere soon. |
|   JFK
2016-04-20 21:11 | Desscythe17 wrote http://chrysler.co.uk/ Nice going Fiat group... |
| Desscythe17
2016-04-20 20:44 | chrysler.co.uk/ |
 | JFK
2015-10-09 19:53 | Oh, I see your point. The different methods of measuring HP sucks, it should be unified IMHO. |
| Desscythe17
2015-10-09 19:51 | JFK wrote That is odd, usually, when one model stops producing, it will be no longer avaliable for other markets (if the production does not move in other country, like Daewoo - Uzbekistan case). Interesting move on european market. "Lets throw away small engine and keep only the biggest one with 4 speed automatic transmission." Some people tend to confuse eagle and Chryslers versions, thats why I added same engine as Eagles: www.autorevue.cz/chrysler-vision-tsi-skvela-volba-zkusenosti_3 You can see here that it is stated that it have even more torque/power than US version. Small mistake with the years, I will edit the Eagle soon. American cars on the European market usually had the biggest engines, as American cars were seen as expensive, thirsty luxury cars. So if you are going to buy one, you'll want the best one. The horsepower thing often happens. European horsepower and American horsepower are not the same. American horsepower is always a little lower. Japanese cars also use European hp on Webcarstory, so you can see that the same car with the same engine has more hp in Japan. |
| JFK
2015-10-09 19:41 | That is odd, usually, when one model stops producing, it will be no longer avaliable for other markets (if the production does not move in other country, like Daewoo - Uzbekistan case). Interesting move on european market. "Lets throw away small engine and keep only the biggest one with 4 speed automatic transmission." Some people tend to confuse eagle and Chryslers versions, thats why I added same engine as Eagles: www.autorevue.cz/chrysler-vision-tsi-skvela-volba-zkusenosti_3 You can see here that it is stated that it have even more torque/power than US version. |
|   Rinspeed
2015-10-09 19:33 | i had correct it, chrysler vision is for 1992-1998, (eagle 1993-1997??) Also only one V6 and with little changes. This is why we had to separate both models and not only copy paste the Eagle Vision |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-11 15:03 | Mieguy wrote my first car was a BMW 3 series. do you have an email adress or facebook so we can talk about that? This site is not a good place .gif ";)") you can email me your facebook name to mieguy@web.de (i dont have a problem to show this here) Oh I didn't mean to start a complete conversation, I just meant to respond to your first comment. |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-10 19:34 | my first car was a BMW 3 series. do you have an email adress or facebook so we can talk about that? This site is not a good place you can email me your facebook name to mieguy@web.de (i dont have a problem to show this here) It was destroyed in a non-fatal head-on collision while i was driving it:   -- Last edit: 2014-03-12 18:53:03 |
| Desscythe17
2014-03-10 19:03 | Mieguy wrote i am proud to own a very unique Chrysler Stratus. Rear and interior shot are of my own car. Only 57,000 kilometres driven! It was first licensed 1999 in Geneva, Switzerland. Then the female owner moved to Berlin. It stayed in a garage from 2008 to 2014. In 2014 i bought the car which still was in nice shape like fresh from the assembly lane. Just 2 scratches on the left side, every electronic working which is unusual for a Chrysler. With full service history. Got the TÜV-badge on first try! It's a nice car, I'm not a big fan of the exterior, but the interior looks heavenly! I don't know if it's your first car or not, but I sure hope my first car will be American. Not that they're expensive in sell price, but I need a job with which I can afford the gas, which is very expensive here, unless you'd buy gas in Belgium or Germany. |
|
Mieguy
2014-03-10 18:51 | i am proud to own a very unique Chrysler Stratus. Rear and interior shot are of my own car. Only 57,000 kilometres driven! It was first licensed 1999 in Geneva, Switzerland. Then the female owner moved to Berlin. It stayed in a garage from 2008 to 2014. In 2014 i bought the car which still was in nice shape like fresh from the assembly lane. Just 2 scratches on the left side, every electronic working which is unusual for a Chrysler. With full service history. Got the TÜV-badge on first try! -- Last edit: 2014-03-10 18:52:31 |
 |
 Ford78
2013-10-31 20:23 | sajmon14 wrote Origin USA? This car was done by Hillman and later marketed by other brands and sold by European Chrysler And ANOTHER THING! Group 1?! Why???? |
| sajmon14
2013-10-31 16:48 | Origin USA? This car was done by Hillman and later marketed by other brands and sold by European Chrysler |
 | Rinspeed
2012-09-16 17:14 | fck wrote Rinspeed, could you add an edit option to entries in predecessors/successors? To just add the number of car in existing entries without pictures? Not necessary, del and edit |
|  fck
2012-09-16 16:57 | Rinspeed, could you add an edit option to entries in predecessors/successors? To just add the number of car in existing entries without pictures? |
 |
 carcrasher88
2011-10-23 19:28 | Production site should be either Newark, Delaware or Toluca, Mexico, but I don't know which. Or is it both, like the Dodge Spirit of which it is a rebadged version of? |
|
carcrasher88
2011-10-02 17:41 | Desscythe17 wrote only the years will prove if this is a good or a bad strategy. I have absolutely no idea if it's smart or stupid. (talking about fiat freemont/lancia thema etc.) I remember reading online (it was either Autoblog.com, or Jalopnik.com), that Fiat dealers were getting more Freemont orders than expected, which tells me it might do pretty well. Hopefully with the refinement of the new 300, it's Lancia Thema version will do very well. |
|  Sandie 2011-10-02 14:52 | Last Lancias were sold in the UK in 1993. As Chrysler have a presence in the UK (dealer network, brand recognition etc) but no UK friendly models to sell (the two biggest sectors here are Ypsillon and Delta sized cars and the only other car Chrysler currently sells here is the Grand Voyager) it was decided to sell them as Chryslers. I don't think it will be hugely successful for them as there is a lot of competition in the sectors and the cars are a bit expensive where Chrysler has always been a cheaper brand. As a strategy on the whole it is not so bad. The costs of developing new models will be reduced by virtue of sharing them out. -- Last edit: 2011-10-02 14:53:39 |
| Desscythe17
2011-10-02 10:23 | only the years will prove if this is a good or a bad strategy. I have absolutely no idea if it's smart or stupid. (talking about fiat freemont/lancia thema etc.) |
| Rinspeed
2011-10-02 09:35 | You had to think that Chrysler Ypsilon and Delta are only for UK! And in this country, if i dont do mistake, there isn't Lancia for some years so it's new cars for them and i think it's a good strategy for this 2 Lancia in UK. For Freemont and others, it's not the same thing, Fiat had work a lot to do a very better "Journey" with Freemont (engines, dashboard, suspensions ...). |
|
Mieguy
2011-10-02 09:25 | oh come on, Chrysler does get more and more ridicolous. Chryslers get rebadged to Lancias, Dodges to Fiats and Lancias get rebadged to Chrysler!! My opinion is i want to buy a Chrysler and not a rebadged Lancia. I want to buy a Dodge with a Dodge-Badge and not a Fiat-Badge. I would never buy a Fiat Freemont, beacuse it has no Dodge-Badge! How far will this sheme go down in its niveau?? |