Comments
| Related page | Author | Message |
|---|---|---|
 |   Rinspeed
2011-08-03 09:46 | i had changed the name because the rule is to put when it's possible the name in the origin counrty and the name in France is Mégane Estate |
 |
 ACE the ultimatum
2011-08-03 07:36 | WoW |
 |   Desscythe17
2011-08-02 17:54 | most awesome hot hatch on the market! |
 |   fck
2011-08-02 10:05 | Pieces of this car are in Italdesign manufacture but noone rebuild it. |
 | fck
2011-08-01 19:12 | Volvo reject this project, so Bertone modified it then and sold to Citroen. |
|
Tak
2011-08-01 17:05 | Lol its a Citroen BX by Volvo or what ? |
 | Desscythe17
2011-08-01 13:01 | I personally find this Escalade the ugliest. The newer ones have a way better front, and even a better rear. |
 | Desscythe17
2011-08-01 10:02 | the car itself looks amazing, they only ruined the rear. |
| Desscythe17
2011-08-01 09:58 | so there is none left? what a pity. |
 |
 carcrasher88
2011-08-01 01:29 | Because of trademarking issues, this car was also known as "Dodge Concept Vehicle" From Wikipedia: After the unveiling of the Copperhead, Dodge got complaints from another company that had the copyrights to the Copperhead name and as a result, Dodge could not use it. To avoid lawsuits, DaimlerChrysler unofficially renamed the car, with it being referred to as the 'Concept Vehicle' instead of 'Copperhead' in modern press kits, and on scale toys and merchandise. This made press kits or items with the Copperhead name collectibles. -- Last edit: 2011-08-01 01:29:59 |
 |
 Gomselmash11
2011-07-31 19:44 | Rear image -> www.madle.org/exnr300.htm |
 | fck
2011-07-31 19:33 | afaik they didn't mount any engine on it, but it was planned to mount a 4.0 V8. |
 | fck
2011-07-31 19:12 | Desscythe17 wrote this car is horrible enough when it's only made by Kia, why does another brand need it? Looking on rest of their production I assume that iranian car market isn't too demanding. .gif ";)") |
| fck
2011-07-31 19:11 | After several tests this car was sold into some company owner. He's propably using is daily, but some day the car was burned by unhappy workers during the strike. |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-31 18:00 | Desscythe17 wrote I thought this car was called the QQMe Wow is the concept car, QQme is the production car |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-31 18:00 | Another time it's a concept car in 2005 by pininfarina so it's before RCZ (2010) and Eclipse (2006). |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 17:55 | I don't really see the RCZ in it, only the Eclipse. |
|
carcrasher88
2011-07-31 17:50 | Really? I see a lot of Peugeot RCZ and Mitsubishi Eclipse in this car. But, it is good looking. |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 17:48 | looks pretty good, not too much like a copy. |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 17:48 | I thought this car was called the QQMe |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 17:47 | shouldn't this be a concept car? |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-31 16:45 | Desscythe17 wrote wow, this car looks stunning and has a nice engine! hopefully it will make production. Yes it will be the new Riich Z5 in a few months |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 15:49 | wow, this car looks stunning and has a nice engine! hopefully it will make production. |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-31 15:45 | this car is horrible enough when it's only made by Kia, why does another brand need it? |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-30 23:16 | Desscythe17 wrote I guess this is the same car as the Dr 1? yes, just a different front |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-30 22:55 | I guess this is the same car as the Dr 1? |
 | Desscythe17
2011-07-30 22:55 | looks very nice for a chinese car, thank you Bertone. |
 | fck
2011-07-30 19:47 | Rinspeed wrote Bertone! Good job  |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 19:45 | Bertone! |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-30 19:43 | fck wrote Yes, I understood - several eastern prototypes got into private hands after denied a serial production. So it's prototypes not road cars. The make hadn't do it to be sold at the beginning, just to do some test. |
| fck
2011-07-30 19:40 | Rinspeed wrote No you dont understand what i i want to say. The difference is that a road car had a road homologation AND had be sold to someone. The car had be construct to be sold. The prototype had be construct to do some test (design or technic on the road or not). So if your cars arent be construct to be sold, it's prototype. Yes, I understood - several eastern prototypes got into private hands after denied a serial production. -- Last edit: 2011-07-30 19:40:48 |
| fck
2011-07-30 19:37 | It was made when Chrysler owned Lamborghini, it's the same shit like Lamborghini Portofino. Have no idea what design studio made it, so it could be GM stylists work. -- Last edit: 2011-07-30 19:38:41 |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 19:35 | i dont think that it's Lamborghini that had do it but who?? |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 19:33 | No you dont understand what i i want to say. The difference is that a road car had a road homologation AND had be sold to someone. The car had be construct to be sold. The prototype had be construct to do some test (design or technic on the road or not). So if your cars arent be construct to be sold, it's prototype. |
| fck
2011-07-30 19:23 | Well, I assumed that the diffence here between prototype and road car is a serial or limited production, not road homologation. BTW. So I had to change some eastern european cars then. |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 19:02 | fck wrote Actually it's rather a prototype than road car as long as Ferrari blocks the production. Mmmm, i remember to you that this car is a specific command from a man to pininfarina, not a prototype, it's a road car. The car had be developped with test in France and th man can drive with it on the road. |
| fck
2011-07-30 18:51 | Actually it's rather a prototype than road car as long as Ferrari blocks the production. |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-30 18:19 | Desscythe17 wrote I get that Karry is some kind of van-brand, so what are Rely and Riich? Karry= utilitary cars like Renault Kangoo or Citroen Nemo here Rely= SUV & MPV Riich= Premium cars |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-30 18:01 | I get that Karry is some kind of van-brand, so what are Rely and Riich? |
 |
insanecow
2011-07-30 16:13 | Favorite car of Charlie Sheen. |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 15:36 | Desscythe17 wrote I'm confused, I know Karry is a sub-brand of Chery, but what is Rely? Another sub brand of Chery. There is a last sub brand of Chery that i will do: Riich |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-30 15:33 | I'm confused, I know Karry is a sub-brand of Chery, but what is Rely? |
 |
carcrasher88
2011-07-30 14:28 | Wow...curvy. I like this. Especially the roof. It's got personality, and doesn't look to be a copy of anything I'm familiar with. |
 | Rinspeed
2011-07-30 10:19 | Desscythe17 wrote just barely... Remember, that we need one page by car (and lifted) and me i see a lot of differences in front for this with the cowin or Flagcloud |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-30 10:06 | just barely... |
| Rinspeed
2011-07-30 09:26 | Desscythe17 wrote Why does this car need a page apart from the Cowin and Amulet? you can see by yourself that it's not the same front and the same rear, no?? |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-30 09:08 | Why does this car need a page apart from the Cowin and Amulet? -- Last edit: 2011-07-30 09:08:53 |
 |
Gomselmash11
2011-07-30 01:25 | I like the last rear... the first are ugly. |
| Desscythe17
2011-07-29 20:46 | there were 2 different rears on the 928, and I didn't like the one with this rear. |
|
Gomselmash11
2011-07-29 17:44 | Desscythe17 wrote I don't think the 928 this car was made of was attractive, and this car is just horrible! luckily there were only 43 made. The 928 are nice... but this are horrible |